房天下 > 房天下问答 > 业主生活 > 其他
  • 跪求英语高人翻译文章

    We typically associate the word “science” with a person in a white coat doing experiments in a laboratory. Ideally, experiments should play as big a role in the human sciences as they do in the natural sciences; but in practice this is not usually the case. The are at least three reasons for this.1.Human scientists are often trying to make sense of complex real world situations in which it is simply impossible to run controlled experiment.2.The artificiality of some of the experiments that can be conducted may make the behavior of the participants abnormal.3.There are moral reasons for not conducting experiments that have a negative effect on the people who participate in them.Faced with the above difficulties, what are human scientists to do? One solution is to wait for nature to provide the appropriate experimental conditions. We can, for example, learn something about how a normal brain functions by looking at people who have suffered brain damage; and we can gain some understanding into the roles played by genes and the environment by studying twins, who have been separated at birth and brought up in different families. In the case of economics, economic history can provide us with a bank of-admittedly not very well-controlled-experimental data.However, human scientists do not just sit around waiting for natural experiments to arise. They also think of some experiments of their own. Suppose you want to know how a baby sees the world. We cannot, of course, ask the baby since it has not yet learnt to speak. So it might seem that all we can do is guess. People usually won’t change their mind until it was found out that babies tend to stare at surprising things longer than at unsurprising ones. This key understanding was like opening a window on to the developing mind. There was now a way of testing babies’ expectations and getting some idea of how they are six months old, babies can already do the following things: figuring out that objects consist of parts that move together being aware of the difference between living and non-living things and even doing simple arithmetic work.

    提问者:zr1005

    发布于2010-09-16

共1个回答
  • yxh-lcf 丨Lv 4
    通常我们认为科学家都是那些穿着白大褂,在实验室里面做实验的那些人。事实上,实验在社会科学研究所扮演的角色和科学研究的角色一样的重。但是在实践方面并不是这样的,有以下三个原因:1. 人类科学家通常是试图搞清楚一些真实世界的东西,而这些东西并不是能够通过简单的核对实验能够做出来的。2. 通过可以控制和操作的人为的模拟,实验可能会使那些参与者表现反常。3. 还有一个道德上的原因不能操作这些实验,因为这会对参与者造成负面的影响。面对以上的困难,科学家们应当怎么做?一个就是等待一个合适的实验条件。比如,我们可以通过观察一个患脑部疾病的人来研究一个正常的人是如何学习的;还有就是我们可以在参与者同意的情况下,实验基因和外部环境对学习的影响,这个实验对象是一对从生下来就被分开的双胞胎,他们被送往不同的家庭。在经济领域,经济的历史可以提供给我们真实的并且不是受约束的数据。但是,人类学家不会坐在这里等待可以实验的机会的出现。他们也会研究他们的经历,假设你想知道一个孩子是如何看待这个世界的。当然,我们并不能够问一个还没有学会说话的孩子。所以我们可以假设。研究证明婴儿对于感兴趣的事物会盯住看的时间比不感兴趣的事物时间长,直到这个结果出来之后人们才改变了看法。有一些方式可以测试六个月的婴儿如何期望得到某些事物,同时这个婴儿可以作出一下的事情:辨别有生命的和无生命的物品,甚至是做一些简单的数学算法。
    +1 2010-09-16 举报
热门人气推荐
免责声明:问答内容均来源于互联网用户,房天下对其内容不负责任,如有版权或其他问题可以联系房天下进行删除。